Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use testify instead of t.Fatal or t.Error in server package (part 1) #18971

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mmorel-35
Copy link
Contributor

@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 commented Nov 30, 2024

Description

This uses testify instead of testing for t.Fatal or t.Error calls in server package

Related to #18972

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mmorel-35
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign ahrtr for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @mmorel-35. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.79%. Comparing base (2b32307) to head (bd41130).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Current head bd41130 differs from pull request most recent head c638757

Please upload reports for the commit c638757 to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files

see 20 files with indirect coverage changes

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #18971      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.78%   68.79%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         420      420              
  Lines       35629    35629              
==========================================
+ Hits        24506    24510       +4     
+ Misses       9700     9688      -12     
- Partials     1423     1431       +8     

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2b32307...c638757. Read the comment docs.

@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 force-pushed the testifier/server branch 3 times, most recently from ea9e299 to 56d9dc3 Compare December 1, 2024 21:35
@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Dec 4, 2024

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

@mmorel-35: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-etcd-unit-test-386 bd41130 link true /test pull-etcd-unit-test-386
pull-etcd-unit-test-amd64 bd41130 link true /test pull-etcd-unit-test-amd64
pull-etcd-unit-test-arm64 bd41130 link true /test pull-etcd-unit-test-arm64

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Signed-off-by: Matthieu MOREL <matthieu.morel35@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants