Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use testify instead of t.Fatal or t.Error in client package (part 1) #18967

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mmorel-35
Copy link
Contributor

@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 commented Nov 30, 2024

Description

This uses testify instead of testing for t.Fatal or t.Error calls in client package

Related to #18972

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mmorel-35
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign ahrtr for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @mmorel-35. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.76%. Comparing base (2b32307) to head (1d5a9bd).

Additional details and impacted files

see 21 files with indirect coverage changes

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #18967      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.78%   68.76%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         420      420              
  Lines       35629    35629              
==========================================
- Hits        24506    24499       -7     
- Misses       9700     9706       +6     
- Partials     1423     1424       +1     

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2b32307...1d5a9bd. Read the comment docs.

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Dec 4, 2024

/ok-to-test

…t 1)

Signed-off-by: Matthieu MOREL <matthieu.morel35@gmail.com>
@ivanvc
Copy link
Member

ivanvc commented Dec 4, 2024

/retest

@ivanvc
Copy link
Member

ivanvc commented Dec 4, 2024

Question, @mmorel-35. How are you planning on splitting these pull requests? I want to understand it so that I can deliver a proper review :)

@mmorel-35
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm grouping PR per package/subpackage and priorizing t.Fatal replacement.
I try to limit the number of modification to less than 100 or 200 lines so it stays reviewable

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants